Introduction to 4 Maccabees



On Subject Matter

The book of 4 Maccabees is renowned for its storyline of the supposedly factual account of the martyrdom of a mother and her seven sons, preceded first by the tortuous slaying of the aged priest, Eleazar. The deaths of these nine Jews are recounted for the purpose of demonstrating that reason is sovereign over the passions. The author is a philosopher and is intent upon calling his readers to reign sovereign over their emotions and not give in to the sensual appeals of the Hellenistic corruption occurring all around them. The standard for reason is the Law. Based upon his writing in this work, the author would be classified by today's terminology as a dichotomist. He sees man as consisting of body and soul. He makes no distinction between soul and spirit and the entire work says nothing about the need for regeneration, but appears to be a call for the mind to seek (by means of willpower) to subdue and/or transform the passions of the inner person.

The chart below (Figure 1A) is an attempt to graphically portray the thinking of the author as he presents his argument (primarily in chapter 2). As the chart reveals, the mind holds the apex of position. The ovals near the bottom of the chart reflect the dual aspect of man's nature. Between this dual aspect of man's nature and his mind, is the seat of passions. It is almost as if the passions exist outside of the man as a force to be controlled, though, indeed, they do not. These passions appeal to the baser part of man's being, but the author is explicit in saying that these passions must be subjugated to the intellect and in this way will keep these impulses in check. For example, a passion involving pleasure potentially yields joy (at least temporally). Negatively, a passion involving fear potentially yields pain.



In his own words, he says, The body has its own unique passions as does the soul (cf. the bullet points of the lower part of the chart). All of these cannot be left unchecked. It is the mind which holds these in check and the mind finds its standard from the Law. The author likens reason to a gardener who prunes, waters, and generally domesticates the wild undergrowth seeking to sprout uncontrollably (cf. 1:29). For example, Torah forbids certain foods, but the body craves it. It is reason that holds mastery over these appetites and thereby enables the individual to abstain.

The above contours will enable the reader of 4 Maccabees to more readily follow the discourse and narrative segments of the book. This also prepares the way to better appreciate the literary divisions of the work. The divisions are fairly simple. There are two main segments followed by a prologue. The macro-structure of the book can be outlined as follows:

On Background

The author of 4 Maccabees assumes the reader shares a knowledge of Jewish history especially as it is recorded in 1 and 2 Maccabees. For instance, when the author begins recounting the story of the martyrdom of Eleazar, he is assuming that the reader is familiar with the apocryphal background of 2 Maccabees 6:18-31. Likewise, when he recounts the story of the martyrdom of the mother and the seven sons, he is greatly amplifying 2 Maccabees chapter 7. For convenience sake, these two passages are excerpted here.

2 Maccabees 6:18-311

2 Maccabees 72




Notes


1The translation is taken from Herbert G. May and Bruce M. Metzger, eds., "The Second Book of Maccabees," in The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha (New York: Oxfor University Press, 1977): 274-75.

2Ibid., p. 275-77.

3It will be noted in the above excerpts that the various references to the resurrection of the body are not picked up and echoed in 4 Maccabees. This leads many authors to question whether the author believed in a physical resurrection of the body. Helyer challenges such a conclusion (Cf. Larry R. Helyer, Exploring Jewish Literature of the Second Temple Period [Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002]: 406). He recounts a similar argument from silence regarding the Qumran community. Prior to the recent discoveries, scholars had concluded that the Qumran community did not believe in the resurrection because no discoveries had been made of explicit reference to such. These conclusions have changed since the Judean Desert discoveries. Helyer further notes that Paul does not always reference the resurrection of the bodies in his biblical correspondence, though it is unquestionable that he embraced that doctrine.


Back to 4 Maccabees Index

Back to Apocalypses Index

Apocalyptic and the NT Home Page

This page is provided by Roger DePriest, M.A., Ph.D. student, as part of the "Apocalyptic and the New Testament" site project.