Purpose and Motifs of the Similitudes of Enoch



There is a dualism that pervades Similitudes of Enoch. Again and again one reads of the "righteous ones," "holy ones," and "elect ones." But these essentially form the background to the work. The author has painted as prominent figures on his literary canvas "the sinners," "the wicked ones," and "those who deny the Lord of the Spirits." Their prominence is in the light of their coming judgment. This appears to be the purpose of Similitudes of Enoch. The blessing of the righteous is certainly a motif that courses throughout the work, but the dominant refrain is eschatological judgment in the face of the Son of Man.

The structure of the work consists of three parables as told by the Enoch figure. As Stone observes, these three parables are marked by common terminology and interests and all three maintain the dominant refrain of eschatological judgment.1 The very first verse of the document begins with a temporal marker: "The vision which Enoch saw the second time" (37:1). This is apparently designed to link this work with the Book of Watchers (chapters 1-37) of 1 Enoch. He then declares that "three things" were imparted to him (37:5). These three things are the three parables. The first parable (chapters 38-44) is the briefest of the three and aside from the eschatological judgment refrain, its distinctive is marked by the refrain of final accountability. Below are some representative examples:

As noted above, the judgment of the sinners is far more dominant than the reward of the holy ones. What is notable about these "sinners" is that the author also identifies them with the equivalent terms of "rulers," "princes," and "kings." Apparently, the author's mindset was that it was indicative of those in power to abuse their positions. Thus, they were among the most sinful in that they neglected (and often trampled) the needy and less privileged. It is characteristic of this first parable that in the day of final accountability, there will be reversal of fortune.

The text of the second parable (chapters 45-57) is about a third longer than the first, yet only half as long as the final parable. Though it is not the longest of the three parables, perhaps its central position is by design to be of central importance. Whether this is so or not cannot be proven, but it is certain that of the three parables the second has gathered more attention than the remaining two. The reason for this is its distinctive characteristics. It is in this parable that the phrase "son of man" (or more accurately, "that son of man") is employed repeatedly. In addition to that theologically-weighted term, the author utilizes the terms "Elect One," and "Messiah." These terms, in themselves, are enough to garner the attention of New Testament exegetes. The person described by these terms is a "pre-created redeemer figure who is to be an eschatological judge."2 Some excerpts are provided below to illustrate this observation.

It should be remembered that the overall motif of eschatological judgment continues throughout all three parables as the above citations amply illustrate.

The third and final parable (chapters 57-69) of the Similitudes of Enoch differs only in degree from the second parable. The eschatological judgment motif continues as does the sustained use of the term "Son of Man" and "Elect One." The emphasis, however, has shifted from the character of the Son of Man to the execution of his power and the fulfillment of his pre-ordained assignment. One key aspect of the execution of that power is the judgment by way of the flood. In fact, it is this judgment by way of flood, according to Nickelsburg, "toward which the whole book has been pointing."3 Consider the following excerpts as examples.

These excerpts reveal that the author of the Similitudes of Enoch wants the readers to understand that a day of accounting is coming. The One who will call everyone into account is the Son of Man, who is a pre-existent one and is the Anointed One of the Lord of the Spirits (i.e. Messiah).

The final two chapters of the Similitudes of Enoch are basically epilogues. The first is a brief first-person account of Enoch's translation from earth to heaven. It is more prosaic with very little descriptive elaborations. The second continues in the first person, but is much more illustrative of the grandeur of the heavenly scene that Enoch experiences. Helyer's observation should be seriously considered when he says that in the second epilogue Enoch is transformed into the Son of Man.4 He undoubtedly bases this on the fact that after Enoch is transported to heaven, he reports these words: "You, son of man, who art born in righteousness and upon whom righteousness has dwelt, the righteousness of the Antecedent of Time will not forsake you. ? Everyone that will come to exist and walk shall (follow) your path. ? Together with you shall be their dwelling places; and together with you shall be their portion" (71:14, 16). Nickelsburg suggests that this second epilogue was probably added at a later time as a final conclusion to the entire literary work.5



Notes

1 Michael E. Stone, "Apocalyptic Literature," in Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period: Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Sectarian, Writings, Philo, Josephus, ed. Michael E. Stone (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984): 401.

2Ibid., 402.

3George W. E. Nickelsburg, Jewish Literature Between the Bible and the Mishnah: A Historical and Literary Introduction (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1981): 219.

4Larry R. Helyer, Exploring Jewish Literature of the Second Temple Period (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002): 387.

5Ibid., 221.

Back to Similitudes of Enoch Index

Back to Apocalypses Index

Apocalyptic and the NT Home Page

This page is provided by Roger DePriest, M.A., Ph.D. student, as part of the "Apocalyptic and the New Testament" site project.